Anavitarte Tracker
Highlight pageUpdated August 30, 2026

A paired local tax-base story

HB 997 and SB 474

A combined explainer for two Anavitarte-backed property-tax carveouts that narrowed local tax bases for favored industries.

Why this matters locally

Together, these votes show how selective property-tax relief for business assets can erode local taxable value without offering equivalent broad relief to the rest of the community.

Why this is a stronger narrative than a single bill

Residents often understand local-budget fairness faster through paired examples than through one-off bills. These two measures tell the same story in different industries: special treatment for business property, with local governments left to absorb the revenue loss.

Questions a resident might ask next

  • Why were these industries singled out for exemption?
  • What does this do to the local tax base over time?
  • How does this line up with property-tax relief rhetoric for regular residents?
2021-2022 RegularYea

HB 997

Ad valorem tax; timber equipment and timber products held by timber producers; provide exemption

Bill → beneficiary → local effect

HB 997→Timber producers and timber-property owners→Local taxpayer impact

This matters locally because every industry-specific property-tax carveout makes the local tax base narrower and shifts more pressure onto everyone still paying full freight.

2021-2022 RegularYea

SB 474

Property Tax Exemptions; state-wide exemption; ad valorem taxes for aircraft used for the aerial application of fertilizers or other agricultural products; provide

Bill → beneficiary → local effect

SB 474→Agricultural aviation businesses→Local taxpayer impact

This works the same way as other local tax-base carveouts: a favored business gets the exemption, and the community loses taxable value.

Related questions